3.5.8 Protocol to Secure the School Admission of Unaccompanied Asylum Seekers (UASC) 16 year within 20 Days of coming into Care |
Contents
1. Background
From January to June 2010 The Virtual School for Looked After Children, Oxfordshire set up a task and finish group to examine the education of unaccompanied asylum seekers. It was found that there were commonly delays of between 30 and 60 days in the admission of these young people to Oxfordshire Schools. There was no single reason but amongst the many contributory reasons were:
- Social worker not applying quickly for a place
- A built-in delay of 10 days, the maximum amount of time available to admissions officers for processing applications (if the social worker had not sent the form within 10 days this could mean that the legal minimum for admission already expired before the form was sent to the school).
- Challenges in appointing interpreters.
- Clarification by admissions officers needed about a child's details (form not completed sufficiently clearly or completely).
- Foster carers who commonly are not English mother tongue speakers, failing to understand arrangements for admissions interview.
- Administrative workload in schools.
- Child not put on roll by school until an English as a Second or Other Language beginners class is available.
- Child not put on roll by school until a language assessment has taken place.
- Disputes over age by the home office allowed to delay admission.
Where children were admitted within 20 days the following aspects were common factors:
- Social worker applied for place within a few days of child coming into care.
- Paperwork clear and place available in school.
- Good understanding by school of what risk constitutes and by social worker of information required.
- Quick responses by school and other parties to communications about meetings.
- Language assessed on admission.
- Interim timetable allocated for early days with high levels of in class and peer support.
It was recognised by the working group that the context was different between schools and that not all schools were managing an equal volume of UASC admissions.
Two actions were agreed:
- The drawing up of a protocol which would allow for transparent and synchronised approaches to communications between and actions by Local Authority officers and schools.
- The Virtual Headteacher would initiate a dialogue with senior staff in the three key schools to explore ways in which issues related to resources and uneven patterns of admission could be resolved constructively and fairly.
- Additional headteachers and officers were consulted and the process was completed on 28 July 2010.
2. Timescales
All references to officers are for the central area as this is where UASCs are admitted but protocol would apply to all three areas were a child to be placed in foster care in North or South.
| School working days. Figures in brackets show time available for each action | Action | Responsibility |
| Day 1 | Child taken into care. | Social Worker |
| Day 3 (4) |
|
Family Support Worker Maria Rahimi or Social Worker (asylum) Michelle Hayden, (Children Looked After and Leaving Care Team) |
| Day 7 (4) | Name and school passed to Darren Utonagan who will refer the child to the In Year Fair Access Panel (IYFAP) who will credit the child to the designated school post hoc. Allocation of the child to the school will not in any circumstances be delayed by waiting for a meeting by the panel. Risk Assessment, if appropriate to specified school by social worker. |
Admissions officers: Oxford Academy - Richard Cave Oxford School - Gavin Wardley Cheney School - Garry Hook St Gregory the Great School - Richard Cave* *And other officers as appropriate where other schools are involved |
| If all 3 requested schools already have 3 students in the vulnerable categories placed by In Year Fair Access Panel, including those in care, over number in the National Curriculum Year group appropriate to age, the case must be referred by the admissions officer to Darren Utonagan, the Social Inclusion Officer and secretary to the In Year Fair Access Panel. | Admissions officer | |
| Day 8 (1) | If necessary an alternative school is named by the Social Inclusion Officer who contacts Maria Rahimi by standard email. Maria Rahimi ensures that risk assessment is made available to school. |
Darren Utonagan Maria Rahimi |
| Day 9 (1) | Maria Rahimi informs carers of allocation of alternative school. | Maria Rahimi |
| Day 20 (10) |
|
Social worker |
| Day 20 (10) |
|
The school. In all cases the overall responsibility for the admission belongs to the Designated Teacher for looked after children who will delegate aspects of the work as appropriate. |
| Day 21 (1) |
|
Social Worker Darren Utonagan |
During reorganisation of the city the Diocese agreed to follow Oxfordshire Local Authority Admissions policies.
3. Titles and Contacts
| Name | Post Title | Tel: |
| Neil Darlington | Service Manager for Admissions | 01865815844 |
| Darren Utonagan | Social Inclusion Officer, Central | 01865 815138 |
| Elishia Meade | Social Inclusion Officer, North | 01865 810658 |
| Sharon Oliver | Social Inclusion Officer, South | 01865 816280 |
| Caroline Dod | Senior Practitioner Social Care | 01865 323179 |
| Lucy Wawrzyniak | Secondary Co-ordinator, The Virtual School for Looked After Children | 01865 256640 |
| Maria Rahimi/Michelle Hayden | Family Support Worker and Social Worker (asylum) | 01865 323057/ 01865 323056 |
End





